It's believed that the
first case was reported by the inventor, physicist & mechanical
engineer Nikola Tesla. Described by many as a 'genius', and
recognized as one of the greatest technological scientists of all
time, Tesla suffered late on in his life from a very severe illness
believed to be due to exposure to high levels of electromagnetic
fields throughout his life
The Pulitzer Prize-winning
autobiography of Tesla, written by his close friend John O'neill
described his extreme sensitivities:
"To doctor's he
appeared at death's door. The strange manifestations he exhibited
attracted the attention of a renowned physician, who declared that
medical science could do nothing to aid him. One of the symptoms of
the illness was an acute sensitivity of all the sense-organs. His
senses had always been extremely keen, but this sensitivity was now
so tremendously exaggerated that the effects were a form of torture.
The ticking of a watch three rooms away sounded like the beat of
hammers on an anvil. The vibration of ordinary city traffic, when
transmitted through a chair or bench, pounded through his body. It
was necessary to place the legs of his bed on rubber pads to
eliminate the vibrations. Ordinary speech sounded like thunderous
pandemonium. The slightest touch had the mental effect of a
tremendous blow. A beam of sunlight shining on him produced the
effect of an internal explosion. In the dark he could sense an object
at a distance of a dozen feet by a peculiar creepy sensation in his
forehead. His whole body was constantly wracked by twitches and
tremors. His pulse, he said, would vary from a few feeble throbs per
minute to more than a hundred and fifty. Throughout this mysterious
illness he was fighting with a powerful desire to recover his normal
condition. ".
(as appeared in “Altered
States” website)
While some are Electrohypersensitive.
Here is why we are all electrosensitive
How to manipulate people
into believing what you say is true/false for political and commercial purposes, known as commercial warfare
This is a time-tested trick that seems to work every time. Take for example the plight of electrohypersensitive (EHS) individuals who are experiencing symptoms from pulsed microwave devices (mobile phones, WIFI, DECT – cordless phones).
At
regular intervals, those with vested interests trot out a speech, an
article or a video to try to persuade the masses to continue with their microwave toys. After
all, they tell you, those with EHS are just plain nuts. Oh....what a comforting thought...you can then
say.....it's them. I can go right on ahead and continue with my microwave toy...it's safe...and if I start to get any strange
symptoms well that too will be my imagination...so I don't need to worry at all.
But
it's not just what these articles, videos etc. are putting across but
the sleight of hand they use to fool
you into believing what they tell you.
A point in case is the latest video “This video will hurt”. Spoken in a
robotic voice which somehow stays in your head. It assumes that it's viewers will be gullible and believe it, even though it does not cite any source
material at all. It relies on the power of the rumour without giving its audience any information or reference to Scientific material.
You'll
be forgiven for watching it thinking oh yeah....they had some EHS in
a room, played a film to them about the warning of WIFI and they all
became ill. It's all in their mind. What you might have missed is
that.....
no
Electrohypersensitives took part in this experiment they speak of
the
symptoms experienced by the candidates did not correlate with those
experienced by EHS persons
there
was no report as to whether the candidates continued to experience
the symptoms afterwards when
exposed to emfs in their homes/workplaces as would happen with EHS
persons (i.e. for years afterwards
once sensitised)
the
room/s were not shielded from other sources of emfs – mobiles,
TETRA (for Emergency services – on
hospital roofs), RADAR so even though they weren't exposed to WIFI
they maywell have been exposed
to other sources of emf. In fact unless they were in a totally
screened room they most definitely
would've been exposed to other sources.
The
subjects had to put an aerial on their heads (this is metal and would
have amplified any ambient fields
in the environment)
Imagine being given a freaky aerial to put on your head/on your brain
– who in their right mind wouldn't
walk out of the experiment, especially given that the candidates had
a pre-existing condition of
anxiety”
As I
say, no Electrohypersensitives took part in this experiment and
symptoms reported here did not report to have correlated with those
EHS persons experience, but if you watched the video this is the
conclusion you will most likely have made. It's what you want to
hear i.e. that you aren't in any danger or risk and can carry on just
like before, using your pulsed microwaved WIFI.
The
test given and conclusion is what is known as a moronic argument.
Here's why......
Imagine
the same experiment but now we are going to test whether heart
attacks are real or whether it's all in the mind. Take a two groups
of people, split them up. One watches a film about cheese and how it
can give you a heart attack, the other watches a cartoon. All join
together to be served with a cheese sandwich. 50% of the people
think they might be having a heart attack when they eat the cheese,
some even get a little anxious and a small percentage get panic
attacks. Candidates have a pre-existing condition of anxiety.
Therefore.....this proves that heart attacks are all in the mind and
there is no such thing as heart attacks.
Convinced? Well you just
were when it was Electrosensitives that were the bait. Caught hook
line and sinker. Those of you more astute might have noticed I
changed the end to 50% of the candidates, but I didn't mention
whether that included those who watched the film or not. Just like
in nocebo study, they reported those with the severest symptoms came
from the group who watched the film, but they didn't say how many
were affected with the “severest symptoms”. It could have been
one or two people. They let you believe that it was all or the
majority of those who watched the film. They led you to believe it
was the 50% who watched the film. Whereas it might have been just a
few people. In any study you will get people who will be influenced
by what they see/hear. How convinced were you of the video with the
robotic voice, telling you (without any source material or back-up,
that EHS was all in the mind). We are all influenced to a certain
degree but when it comes down to an obvious connection of being
exposed to emfs & being in pain, not being exposed and not
feeling pain you would be plain foolish to ignore that.
There
are scores of articles with the same kind of propaganda. You have to
ask yourself why would they go to so much trouble to tell you that
EHS people are imagining things?
My
advice is - be discerning. Apply critical logic and most of
all....find the source....the original document, research ....and
study it. Scrutinise it. Don't just look for the easy option.
If you
just read the conclusion you might be tempted to dismiss EHS, so read
the whole report and you'll wonder why they made the conclusion. Did
they even read the whole report themselves?
From
this you'll deduce EHS isn't real because EHS persons felt prickling
pain but there was no mobile phone signal. What is so blindingly
obvious so much so, you'll miss it is that they are being exposed to
an MRI machine (giving out high fields of emfs) which will definitely
set off symptoms. Even the HPA agree on that.
In
case you miss the obvious, this paper acknowledges the symptoms of
Electrosensitivity to magnetic fields, i.e. The magnetic component
of electromagnetic fields by the HPA.
Most
of IEEE Research is undertaken by J Reilly. You'll see what Reilly
has to say here
So that blows the argument
that there's no link.
Another
strategy propaganda uses is to utterly confuse the reader
If
you can't absorb all of what is said here go to “Discussion” 3rd
paragraph which sums things up.
But again, best to read the whole document if
you can to get the full picture.
So what have Doctors like this got to
lose if we concede that WIFI is dangerous?
It would call into question the ethics
of experimenting on humans with TES & with Transcranial magnetic
stimulation (TMS) for research purposes – they won't be able to do
the tests anymore due to the adverse health effects. This would
limit or even put an end to their transhumanism/ neuro-enhancement
experimentation.
This
is a summation paper on the different reports of Electrosensitivity.
If
you read this version you will conclude it's all in the mind
But
if you read this version, you'll see that the issue isn't so cut and
dry. Don't miss the bit about 7 studies showing EHS persons
correctly identifying a signal.
You'll
read that it's not the same for all Electrosensitives, some get
effects straight away, some get the "hangover" effect as
noted here, i.e. There are short term effects and longer term
effects for Electrosensitives.
Again
the moronic argument is....well then if they couldn't tell, then
they can't be Electrosensitive.
they
"hit" the Electrosensitives with the real signal first off
and once their brains were blased, they hit them with a sham signal.
Could they tell the difference? no, they couldn't tell if the next
signal was a sham or not, they were too hammered by the real signal
to tell. But you didn't realise that it happened in that order.
You just hear Chinese whispers, the urban myth and keep that going
because it's more comforting to you.
Here
are additional factors which weren't revealed
whether they are earthed, i.e. On ground floor – this influences
whether their systems collect a charge.
what their particular frequency sensitivity is before testing begins
(in case you didn't know we are sensitive to a particular frequency, one that
resonances with our own)
what their baseline biological rates are, e.g. Heart rate, nerve
action potentials, brainwave patterns
all of these can be shown by ECG, EMG, EEG = our
electrical measurements (because we are ALL electromagnetic beings).
What were the flaws of the study?
the signal wasn't pulsed as is the
case in real mobile phone signals.
they used a signal which mimicked a
900Mhz mobile phone signal, not an ACTUAL mobile phone signal.
Just ONE frequency was used – 900Mhz
so if you're an Electrosensitive who is sensitised to other
frequencies, you won't be
affected.
NO FIELD MEASUREMENTS ARE EVER TAKEN OF THE TEST CONDITIONS WITH EMF EQUIPMENT. WHY IS THAT?
Any research can be put a certain way
to lead you to conclude what they want you to conclude. Here they
report that 60% of EHS correctly identified the presence of a
signal, then they report another 63% (but didn't say it was the EHS
group!) reported a signal with the sham effect. So it might have
been 63% of the controls who thought there was a signal in the sham
condition through guesswork thus completely negating EHS perception
by a weight of measure approach.
The study confesses a leakage of the
sham signal which may have been picked up by sensitives.
Don't miss....“the nature of our data
required us to adopt a different analytical strategy from that
originally planned. As such, this calculation should be taken as
indicative only”. Or this “
For headache, burning sensations, skin
sensations, and eye pain we found evidence of a main group
effect—sensitive participants reported greater severity”.
Don't
miss the footnote
Funding This study was
funded by the Programme Management Committee (PMC) of the Mobile
Telecommunications and Health Research (MTHR) programme
(www.mthr.org.uk),
an independent body set up to provide funding for research into the
possible health effects of mobile telecommunications. The MTHR is
itself jointly funded by the UK Department of Health and the mobile
telecommunications industry
Powerwatch criticizes the test
methodology of Rubin's study
This
test used
“Tetra-like” signals – so not actually Tetra
signals, just similar to them.
It speaks for itself – the signal
didn't contain the real Tetra which would be bursts, peaks and
troughs, instead they used a constant signal. The room wasn't
shielded so would be open to other emfs during the sham part of the
testing. Still, it reports sensitives and controls had significant
effects, so why does it say at the conclusion...nothing to see here?
I think you might find the backward slime adjustments, the mean
averaging, the charts with unfathomable lines might help with smoke &
mirrors.
Here is the chart that appears on page 16. It tells you the maximum time in any one hour
for exposure should be 6 mins.
It
acknowledges the symptoms of nerve pain & spasms, heart
disruption as described by many Electrosensitives. Yes, you read
that correctly. You can inform yourself – to be forewarned is to
be forearmed. If you experience shock-like symptoms, nerve pain,
heart pain or heart disruptions then switch off your mobile, WIFI,
move to an area clear of signals (including your neighbours'
techno-devices). Do ya feel better now? Well do ya?
Tinnitus is the most common symptom in
EHS. Also neurotransmitter changes have been observed. It is
extremely likely that tinnitus is actually cranial nerve stimulation
as demonstrated here
How the microwave limits were decided
in the first place
i.e. by asking people....do you feel it
now?...what about now?......so it's well known that we all can feel our
own sensations and pain. What's happening now is that we are all
being told, no, you've got yourself wrong, don't listen to your own
body, don't listen to your instincts, don't feel your own senses.
Instead.....
we'll make an app for that.
When thinking about microwave
radiation, most people with a mobile phone imagine that the microwave
signals sit uniformly in the air as if they are in waiting for them
to use. “It's everywhere” they say. But this simply is not
true. There is a background radiation which can be measured with an
EMF meter. In my experience of measuring, this is around 3.6mV. It
is a steady field, generally unmoving or at least varying only by a
few mV which will be a slow random movement.
When the mobile phone is switched on it
will draw power to the device from the nearest Telephone Mast. This
creates a microwave field around the mobile phone in the region of
1,000-2,000 mV. So the field around you has risen in an instant from
3.6mV to 2,000mV. This intense field isn't there before you switch
on your phone. After the initial switch on, the voltage will lower
until you begin using the Apps and will spike again on the different
connections. Spikes = a power surge, or a burst. This creates, I
believe, a shock to the nervous system. It certainly does with
Electrohypersensitives. At least, we are able to feel this on our
peripheral nerves which results in intense pain. When making a call,
the mobile phone voltage peaks very rapidly to around 2,000mV. It
will continue at a figure between 1-2,000mV but it will flicker
rapidly at differing levels, something that your nervous system will
register. This will effect the cortisol in your body.
You and your mobile phone will be in an
area known as the near field.
This field is calculated to be roughly within 1 meter of the device
and will be more intense than in the far field – outside of this
range.
Many people criticize
Electrohypersensitives for not being able to reproduce the exact same
pain in every situation (i.e. changing environments) with a mobile
phone. But we need to think....with a mobile phone even, many people
walk around their environment trying to pick up a good reception
spot, why should our brains be any different? Even standing on the
same spot, I hear advice to mobile users are to move 45 degrees to the left/right for better
reception. So it makes sense our brain will need to be orientated
when being in receipt of a good strong signal (being affected). For
WIFI even – does the laptop pick up the strongest signal in exactly
the same place and location? No. In the 70's, we used to have to
hold an aerial in all different places to get the TV picture to work.
Mostly it worked with someone holding it. It transmitted better
with a human acting as an aerial. Hotspots are not uniform and are
forever changing because the waves are reflected in a moving, living
world - on different surfaces, especially metal, the signal bounces
around converging, reforming in the space. Where waves overlap this
is where the strongest fields are, this is where the signal is its
most powerful. Especially where signals cross at 90 degree angles, the
signal intensifies. The signals will form in layers and according to physics at this
90 degree angle it doubles. The electrosensitive
brain picks up on the hotspot, the strongest field and pain ensues at
this moment.
So in this living, breathing, moving
location, this hotspot (brain zap spot) is going to be in a
different spot in the atmosphere, especially when you apply the test
in different atmospheric locations, so it makes sense that in order to be able to
feel the signal or be affected by it everytime at the exact same
place, you would need to be in the same situation, eg. In your home
where your neighbours' gadgets are emitting from the same place. It
makes sense that a moving hotspot in the atmosphere will sometimes miss the target of
your brain as you move around so that sometimes you will be “zapped”
and other times not. Only when a static device is emitting to a
static body will it effect be the same. However, this is missing out
half the equation, as a moving body will generate extra
electromagnetic fields, or rather calculations should be made on a
moving body first as this is what is intrinsic to the nature of a
body.
It's acknowledged that the brain is
affected by waves that traverse from the side of the head, so if a
particular wave is coming at you from the front, your brain will not
register it with the same intensity, perhaps not at all (I will leave
that for the Engineers). Again if you are moving, then this is also
why exact responses cannot be moulded into a definitive experiment.
Additionally, Electrohypersensitives
are usually affected by a particular frequency or a set of particular
frequencies. Some will be affected by frequencies of a particular
mobile phone carrier, others by WIFI, more still by DECT, TETRA or
other. So to put Electrosensitives to the test, it should be
established first, which frequencies we are affected by or not,
otherwise there will be false results.
One test is always quoted to try to
persuade the general public that Electrosensitives are not able to
register the presence of microwaves. There is no link to this study,
but it tells of a transmitter being switched on or off and apparently
Electrohypersensitives should be able sense this immediately.
Despite the fact that the transmitters will set up oscillations to
the nerves which will continue even if the transmitter is turned off.
Think about the time when you went to a concert or club and you came
out of the doors with your ears “ringing”. Does that stop the
moment you leave the club or concert. The moment? How long
afterwards do your ears stop ringing? Additionally, in this Test,
there is no information being transmitted with the signal from the
transmitter and this is what is causing the problem, the information
+ the signal which overloads the senses, so this test just includes
the carrier signal being switched on or off. We are
Electrohypersensitives but we are not psychics or machines that go on and off. I wonder what other disability has to undergo such deep denial and scrutiny. Imagine the effects of alcohol going through the same process whereby hardcore drinkers were put forward as candidates, why, we would all be saying alcohol has no effect, none at all, and those of you that were inebriated would be amongst the first, shouting...it's having no effect on me.
How do the
Experts determine the safety of your mobile phone?
SAR
(radiation) is measured on a phantom head. The plastic head is
filled with water to
represent
the human brain. They view this as a worst case scenario, a whole
head full of liquid.
They are
looking at this as the more water, the more radiation and therefore
even if your brain
was
completely full of water, it still would not exceed the limits of
radiation according to their computer measurements.
However,
what they are not measuring or even contemplating is the effect of
the signal, i.e.
the kinetic
energy of the pulses. All mobile phones emit pulses of microwave power
(energy), which can be thought of like the power of a gale-force wind
firing in tiny bursts.
The effect
of this energy pulse works in exact opposite of the measurement
calculations above.
According
to the plastic vox model, (full of water), the dynamic power of the
signal would be like a drop in the ocean, it will be much diluted,
but to a human brain with small passages of liquid, it will
have a greater impact. It stands to reason – take a straw and blow
through it, try to move a gallon of
water and you will make a small surface wave, but on a trickle of
liquid (like that found in your brain) you can blow the water until
it runs dry. We are looking at a huge beam of energy pulse on a tiny
vessel/ tiny amount of liquid through the cranium or through other
passages in our bodies as opposed to a head size full of water. It
stands to reason that the LESS water/liquid, the greater the
impact.
Q. How much
more impact will this have than the original/ current SAR model?
A. 99.999%
in other words, the exact opposite.
If you
compare a head full with the most liquid possible...now think of a
human
brain with
the least liquid and that is what is the calculation should be using
as a model. As a recent
report stated, the current method of calculation will not cover 99%
of the population.
When most people think about the word torture, they might imagine a scene of a prison cell, probably set in a fictional past, with a man, possibly hooded, strung up in chains which are attached to a stone wall. In essence, we think of torture as a work of fiction, something occurring to the outer body, and something happening in the past and...definitely....over there - in another country, another place. Somewhere distant from ourselves. If you have kept up with the latest revelations on torture you will have heard of waterboarding, oh but wait a minute, this interrogation technically isn't classified as torture, or is it?...it makes a person experience a drowning sensation, gasping for air, oxygen deprived, suffocating...but if it doesn't pertain to the classical model we have of torture, then we don't have to classify it as such, do we?
So it seems despite the world becoming more sophisticated and torture becoming more sadistic and mentally/spiritually torturous we can dismiss any inflictions with a clever re-arrangement of definition. As long as we can apply rhetoric, we can negate anything. So how about this....imagine your heart being artificially manipulated, cranked up, forced to beat faster than it should naturally beat. Imagine the quiet journey of your blood, the fluids through your body, which you aren't normally aware of, being ramped up to a fast RUSH. Your neurons firing at a faster pace than you know to be your natural workings, so much that you see flashes of light. Your body trembles, you are agitated, every cell is in fast motion. In fact, imagine your whole system being turned up on a dial to a manic rate so that you are on fast speed, out of your control. So that you feel like your whole body and brain is like having a pneumatic drill through it and every cell is shaking at an atomic level. If that was happening to you at the turn of a switch, or a button, wouldn't you consider that to be torture? Well it is......and Electrosensitives live out this torture every day with their systems being ramped up beyond its natural level from microwave gadgets in our environment. Pulsed microwaves are bio-active. They disrupt the integrity of the cell membrane, interrupt at gap junctions of chemical/electrical pathways, switch on/off ion gate channels, disrupt the heart beat.
Perhaps we have lower blood pressure, quieter (lower voltage) hearts, slower rhythms, we all have different rates, but that doesn't mean our automatic systems shouldn't be entitled to determine its own pace, to work at our bodies' natural rhythms. Please support our right for our brain and body to operate at its natural pace and not the pace of artificial technology pounding at us from the environment (when an exterior signal is stronger than the bodies own signals, it will overtake & dominate that signal by the law of Superposition). It's Torture being an Electrosensitive. Your signature could make a difference to our world. Thank you. http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/new-biologically-based-emf-public-exposure/
