It's believed that the
first case was reported by the inventor, physicist & mechanical
engineer Nikola Tesla. Described by many as a 'genius', and
recognized as one of the greatest technological scientists of all
time, Tesla suffered late on in his life from a very severe illness
believed to be due to exposure to high levels of electromagnetic
fields throughout his life
The Pulitzer Prize-winning
autobiography of Tesla, written by his close friend John O'neill
described his extreme sensitivities:
"To doctor's he
appeared at death's door. The strange manifestations he exhibited
attracted the attention of a renowned physician, who declared that
medical science could do nothing to aid him. One of the symptoms of
the illness was an acute sensitivity of all the sense-organs. His
senses had always been extremely keen, but this sensitivity was now
so tremendously exaggerated that the effects were a form of torture.
The ticking of a watch three rooms away sounded like the beat of
hammers on an anvil. The vibration of ordinary city traffic, when
transmitted through a chair or bench, pounded through his body. It
was necessary to place the legs of his bed on rubber pads to
eliminate the vibrations. Ordinary speech sounded like thunderous
pandemonium. The slightest touch had the mental effect of a
tremendous blow. A beam of sunlight shining on him produced the
effect of an internal explosion. In the dark he could sense an object
at a distance of a dozen feet by a peculiar creepy sensation in his
forehead. His whole body was constantly wracked by twitches and
tremors. His pulse, he said, would vary from a few feeble throbs per
minute to more than a hundred and fifty. Throughout this mysterious
illness he was fighting with a powerful desire to recover his normal
condition. ".
(as appeared in “Altered
States” website)
While some are Electrohypersensitive.
Here is why we are all electrosensitive
How to manipulate people
into believing what you say is true/false for political and commercial purposes, known as commercial warfare
This is a time-tested trick that seems to work every time. Take for example the plight of electrohypersensitive (EHS) individuals who are experiencing symptoms from pulsed microwave devices (mobile phones, WIFI, DECT – cordless phones).
At
regular intervals, those with vested interests trot out a speech, an
article or a video to try to persuade the masses to continue with their microwave toys. After
all, they tell you, those with EHS are just plain nuts. Oh....what a comforting thought...you can then
say.....it's them. I can go right on ahead and continue with my microwave toy...it's safe...and if I start to get any strange
symptoms well that too will be my imagination...so I don't need to worry at all.
But
it's not just what these articles, videos etc. are putting across but
the sleight of hand they use to fool
you into believing what they tell you.
A point in case is the latest video “This video will hurt”. Spoken in a
robotic voice which somehow stays in your head. It assumes that it's viewers will be gullible and believe it, even though it does not cite any source
material at all. It relies on the power of the rumour without giving its audience any information or reference to Scientific material.
You'll
be forgiven for watching it thinking oh yeah....they had some EHS in
a room, played a film to them about the warning of WIFI and they all
became ill. It's all in their mind. What you might have missed is
that.....
no
Electrohypersensitives took part in this experiment they speak of
the
symptoms experienced by the candidates did not correlate with those
experienced by EHS persons
there
was no report as to whether the candidates continued to experience
the symptoms afterwards when
exposed to emfs in their homes/workplaces as would happen with EHS
persons (i.e. for years afterwards
once sensitised)
the
room/s were not shielded from other sources of emfs – mobiles,
TETRA (for Emergency services – on
hospital roofs), RADAR so even though they weren't exposed to WIFI
they maywell have been exposed
to other sources of emf. In fact unless they were in a totally
screened room they most definitely
would've been exposed to other sources.
The
subjects had to put an aerial on their heads (this is metal and would
have amplified any ambient fields
in the environment)
Imagine being given a freaky aerial to put on your head/on your brain
– who in their right mind wouldn't
walk out of the experiment, especially given that the candidates had
a pre-existing condition of
anxiety”
As I
say, no Electrohypersensitives took part in this experiment and
symptoms reported here did not report to have correlated with those
EHS persons experience, but if you watched the video this is the
conclusion you will most likely have made. It's what you want to
hear i.e. that you aren't in any danger or risk and can carry on just
like before, using your pulsed microwaved WIFI.
The
test given and conclusion is what is known as a moronic argument.
Here's why......
Imagine
the same experiment but now we are going to test whether heart
attacks are real or whether it's all in the mind. Take a two groups
of people, split them up. One watches a film about cheese and how it
can give you a heart attack, the other watches a cartoon. All join
together to be served with a cheese sandwich. 50% of the people
think they might be having a heart attack when they eat the cheese,
some even get a little anxious and a small percentage get panic
attacks. Candidates have a pre-existing condition of anxiety.
Therefore.....this proves that heart attacks are all in the mind and
there is no such thing as heart attacks.
Convinced? Well you just
were when it was Electrosensitives that were the bait. Caught hook
line and sinker. Those of you more astute might have noticed I
changed the end to 50% of the candidates, but I didn't mention
whether that included those who watched the film or not. Just like
in nocebo study, they reported those with the severest symptoms came
from the group who watched the film, but they didn't say how many
were affected with the “severest symptoms”. It could have been
one or two people. They let you believe that it was all or the
majority of those who watched the film. They led you to believe it
was the 50% who watched the film. Whereas it might have been just a
few people. In any study you will get people who will be influenced
by what they see/hear. How convinced were you of the video with the
robotic voice, telling you (without any source material or back-up,
that EHS was all in the mind). We are all influenced to a certain
degree but when it comes down to an obvious connection of being
exposed to emfs & being in pain, not being exposed and not
feeling pain you would be plain foolish to ignore that.
There
are scores of articles with the same kind of propaganda. You have to
ask yourself why would they go to so much trouble to tell you that
EHS people are imagining things?
My
advice is - be discerning. Apply critical logic and most of
all....find the source....the original document, research ....and
study it. Scrutinise it. Don't just look for the easy option.
If you
just read the conclusion you might be tempted to dismiss EHS, so read
the whole report and you'll wonder why they made the conclusion. Did
they even read the whole report themselves?
From
this you'll deduce EHS isn't real because EHS persons felt prickling
pain but there was no mobile phone signal. What is so blindingly
obvious so much so, you'll miss it is that they are being exposed to
an MRI machine (giving out high fields of emfs) which will definitely
set off symptoms. Even the HPA agree on that.
In
case you miss the obvious, this paper acknowledges the symptoms of
Electrosensitivity to magnetic fields, i.e. The magnetic component
of electromagnetic fields by the HPA.
Most
of IEEE Research is undertaken by J Reilly. You'll see what Reilly
has to say here
So that blows the argument
that there's no link.
Another
strategy propaganda uses is to utterly confuse the reader
If
you can't absorb all of what is said here go to “Discussion” 3rd
paragraph which sums things up.
But again, best to read the whole document if
you can to get the full picture.
So what have Doctors like this got to
lose if we concede that WIFI is dangerous?
It would call into question the ethics
of experimenting on humans with TES & with Transcranial magnetic
stimulation (TMS) for research purposes – they won't be able to do
the tests anymore due to the adverse health effects. This would
limit or even put an end to their transhumanism/ neuro-enhancement
experimentation.
This
is a summation paper on the different reports of Electrosensitivity.
If
you read this version you will conclude it's all in the mind
But
if you read this version, you'll see that the issue isn't so cut and
dry. Don't miss the bit about 7 studies showing EHS persons
correctly identifying a signal.
You'll
read that it's not the same for all Electrosensitives, some get
effects straight away, some get the "hangover" effect as
noted here, i.e. There are short term effects and longer term
effects for Electrosensitives.
Again
the moronic argument is....well then if they couldn't tell, then
they can't be Electrosensitive.
they
"hit" the Electrosensitives with the real signal first off
and once their brains were blased, they hit them with a sham signal.
Could they tell the difference? no, they couldn't tell if the next
signal was a sham or not, they were too hammered by the real signal
to tell. But you didn't realise that it happened in that order.
You just hear Chinese whispers, the urban myth and keep that going
because it's more comforting to you.
Here
are additional factors which weren't revealed
whether they are earthed, i.e. On ground floor – this influences
whether their systems collect a charge.
what their particular frequency sensitivity is before testing begins
(in case you didn't know we are sensitive to a particular frequency, one that
resonances with our own)
what their baseline biological rates are, e.g. Heart rate, nerve
action potentials, brainwave patterns
all of these can be shown by ECG, EMG, EEG = our
electrical measurements (because we are ALL electromagnetic beings).
What were the flaws of the study?
the signal wasn't pulsed as is the
case in real mobile phone signals.
they used a signal which mimicked a
900Mhz mobile phone signal, not an ACTUAL mobile phone signal.
Just ONE frequency was used – 900Mhz
so if you're an Electrosensitive who is sensitised to other
frequencies, you won't be
affected.
NO FIELD MEASUREMENTS ARE EVER TAKEN OF THE TEST CONDITIONS WITH EMF EQUIPMENT. WHY IS THAT?
Any research can be put a certain way
to lead you to conclude what they want you to conclude. Here they
report that 60% of EHS correctly identified the presence of a
signal, then they report another 63% (but didn't say it was the EHS
group!) reported a signal with the sham effect. So it might have
been 63% of the controls who thought there was a signal in the sham
condition through guesswork thus completely negating EHS perception
by a weight of measure approach.
The study confesses a leakage of the
sham signal which may have been picked up by sensitives.
Don't miss....“the nature of our data
required us to adopt a different analytical strategy from that
originally planned. As such, this calculation should be taken as
indicative only”. Or this “
For headache, burning sensations, skin
sensations, and eye pain we found evidence of a main group
effect—sensitive participants reported greater severity”.
Don't
miss the footnote
Funding This study was
funded by the Programme Management Committee (PMC) of the Mobile
Telecommunications and Health Research (MTHR) programme
(www.mthr.org.uk),
an independent body set up to provide funding for research into the
possible health effects of mobile telecommunications. The MTHR is
itself jointly funded by the UK Department of Health and the mobile
telecommunications industry
Powerwatch criticizes the test
methodology of Rubin's study
This
test used
“Tetra-like” signals – so not actually Tetra
signals, just similar to them.
It speaks for itself – the signal
didn't contain the real Tetra which would be bursts, peaks and
troughs, instead they used a constant signal. The room wasn't
shielded so would be open to other emfs during the sham part of the
testing. Still, it reports sensitives and controls had significant
effects, so why does it say at the conclusion...nothing to see here?
I think you might find the backward slime adjustments, the mean
averaging, the charts with unfathomable lines might help with smoke &
mirrors.
Here is the chart that appears on page 16. It tells you the maximum time in any one hour
for exposure should be 6 mins.
It
acknowledges the symptoms of nerve pain & spasms, heart
disruption as described by many Electrosensitives. Yes, you read
that correctly. You can inform yourself – to be forewarned is to
be forearmed. If you experience shock-like symptoms, nerve pain,
heart pain or heart disruptions then switch off your mobile, WIFI,
move to an area clear of signals (including your neighbours'
techno-devices). Do ya feel better now? Well do ya?
Tinnitus is the most common symptom in
EHS. Also neurotransmitter changes have been observed. It is
extremely likely that tinnitus is actually cranial nerve stimulation
as demonstrated here
How the microwave limits were decided
in the first place
i.e. by asking people....do you feel it
now?...what about now?......so it's well known that we all can feel our
own sensations and pain. What's happening now is that we are all
being told, no, you've got yourself wrong, don't listen to your own
body, don't listen to your instincts, don't feel your own senses.
Instead.....
we'll make an app for that.
